This is just a blog post

Or is it?

It’s well known that the US is a nation of overstatement. This was confirmed to me yesterday during my first day here as a human being (fed and slept, that is, after a thirty-two hour journey: Cape Town to Dubai, surely one of the richest places on the globe, but full of the world’s poorest travellers; Dubai to New York; New York to DC; finally a one hour drive to Maryland).

First, the usual amazement at how BIG everything is: the (super)stores, the SUVs, the houses in this particular neck of the woods (Howard county is apparently one of the wealthiest in the country, and so, little sign of a country in recession here). We travelled behind one big car speeding patriotically along with the stars and stripes attached to its roof. At a red light we got the full spectacle of their rear window: a large sticker proclaiming “Our son serves so that we can be free”, complete wth a picture of said son in uniform. It had that sinister Missing Person feel to it, despite (I suppose) the best intentions of the parents. But as the philosophe pointed out, they (clearly Republicans) have to shout out to make some sense of it all. I wonder, though, if “making sense” of it includes hoping to convert people idly picking their noses at the red lights, or whether it occurs to them that they simply look like fools squealing angst under the dubious cover of “pride”.

At Bertucci’s, the philosophe, his father and I shared a large pizza with pepperoni, artichokes and tomay-do. It was a pretty good pizza, but the best, I think, were the pre-food hot little rolls made out of pizza dough which came with a plate of a very good olive oil-and-herb dipping number. I had a glass of white zinfandel which turned out to be pink, and rather riesling-gewurtztraminer in taste, which was just right for lunch. When I pointed out that they had overcharged us for the wine on the bill, our good waitress saw to it that it was removed entirely. That’s what I call that good service. Also a good idea is their plan of setting up and serving the pizza from a collapsable camping-style table next to the actual table. This means a two-person table can have a large pizza and elbow room. Ingenious.

For dinner I was treated to home-smoked and barbecued ribs. These were very really good (I polished off an entire small rack, which I was assured before we started eating was “not that much meat”, but the same portion sated even the three men at the table, so I think that’s pretty good going). But more interesting is the story of the beans from Famous Dave’s which we had driven many a mile earlier in the day to collect especially for the occasion.

Curious as I always am to discover what makes something worth the drive, or vaut le detour, as the Michelin guide calls it, I had to have a little taste of the beans before they joined the ribs in the barbie for a final heating. According to my father-in-law and his wife, what makes Dave’s beans is the addition of smoked bacon, but the morsel I tried contained what I was sure was sausage, not bacon. This naturally led to a round-the-table tasting and debate as to what exactly is in the beans, with some standing by their conviction that sausage was definitely NOT supposed to be in there, and it therefore simply couldn’t be, despite the obvious appearance, taste and texture of some of the non-bean bits.

The obvious next move was Google, and there I discovered two identical recipes for Dave’s Wilbur Beans which confirmed that the famous flavour in fact comes from a combination of bacon and twice-smoked link sausage and strip steak. This was a surprise to all, and there was a suggestion that since they’re not posted on Famous Dave’s site itself, these recipes may simply be variations, trying to approximate what is surely Dave’s well-kept secret.

If only it were so. In this age of anti-liability, where even the most obvious of things need warning signs (car interiors are full of stickers warning you that if you drive like a fool, you may crash and die), there is no space for secrets. True, Dave doesn’t post the actual recipe on his site, but you will find the obligatory list of ingredients there, which confirms that, indeed, the Wilbur Beans contain beef. Even the Sassy BBQ sauce, which could be the magic ingredient, has its guts laid bare for all to see.

What a sad day for Colonel Sanders that must have been. What have you fantasised about the 11 secret herbs and spices all these years? Coriander, cayenne, cumin, etcetera? Think again. Or don’t. Sometimes ignorance is much more fun. I can’t remember the last time I ate KFC, but I’m sure as hell gonna try some of the new Smoky Chipotle while I’m here. Besides, I’m willing to bet that whatever chemicals create the famous “herbs and spices”, they are no more malign than some of the things in your own kitchen. (People who put Aromat on your popcorn: I’m talking to you).

Before I get to the Chipotle chicken, I have the famed Chesapeake crabcakes on the menu for today, to be taken on the deck of a boat with a beer in hand. Some time in the near future, an evening of lobsters, to eaten wearing a bib. Maybe some pulled pork along the way, or a little crawdaddy. I can’t wait, and only hope not to find nutritional information served with all of this. Might there still be a little intrigue in this big country? We shall see…

Who wudda thunk it

Thanks to my brother-in-law, I have now come across, and sampled, what must be the most unusual use for marmalade yet: pasta. He found the recipe in Food&Wine, and gave me a heads up to add the marmalade with discretion (he followed the 2 tablespoon recommendation, which turned out to be too much). I made it last night, and it works; it definitely works.

Start by frying some chopped up bacon (the original calls for pancetta, but anything porky, cured and with some fat will do the job), and once the fat is rendered and you’ve got some good colour on it (or, when the kitchen smells of breakfast), add a lot of very thinly sliced onion and a good handful of chopped, fresh rosemary. This needs to cook gently for 10-15 minutes, or until the onions are nicely caramelised. I added a good slug of chardonnay to help it along.

The recipe doesn’t use garlic, but as far as I’m concerned all pasta needs garlic, so I added some about half way through the cooking time, together with salt and lots of pepper.

Finally, when you start cooking the pasta (choose something good for holding chunky sauces, like farfalle), stir in 1-2 tablespoons of orange marmalade and take the sauce off the heat. I was cooking for four people with moderate-healthy appetites, which meant 350-400g bacon (one big packet minus enough bacon for breakfast another day), 3 onions, and 1 1/2 tablespoons of the sweet stuff. These proportions were perfect: the marmalade is definitely there, but there is nothing cloying about it; just an unusual, but very nice tang, and a glossy coating on the pasta.

Serve with green salad, nice fresh bread, and freshly grated pecorino: buonissimo!

To dessert: the same woman who gave me the bag of oranges that have now been consumed, variously, in pasta, toast, chicken, and cake, also gave me a bag of dates which begged the obvious: Cape Brandy Pudding. This is one of those righteous desserts in the family of hot sponge cake drenched in syrup, eaten with cold, melting ice-cream (whipped cream is definitely an option, though I prefer ice-cream).  South Africans (and I) love this stuff: malva, vinegar and “fruit cocktail” puddings are all variations of the same, but what makes the brandy pudding king of the batch is a) the addition of nuts, and b) that the sauce it’s doused with contains a hefty 3/4 cup of unboiled (ie. as alcoholic as the day it was bottled) brandy.

I googled and compared three or four recipes, which were thankfully all exactly the same (down to all omitting a crucial ingredient in the sauce: ‘Boil sugar, butter and water till syrup forms’, they prescribe, without mentioning how much water in the list of ingredients). This case of internet plagiarism was very good for me, in fact; it is a blessed rarity to find such consensus about a recipe, and it saved me having to compare and choose between five different ones. So I followed “Funkymunky“‘s directions for an Old Cape Brandy Pudding (not to be confused with a Cape Brandy Pudding, apparently), with just two alterations: I halved the sugar and doubled the nuts – these desserts are always just a bit TOO sweet, and given that it’s full of dates too, I figured less sugar wouldn’t hurt, and it didn’t – and I added fresh ginger.

When it got to pouring the hot syrup over the baked cake, I must say I had some misgivings; I couldn’t imagine how that little pudding would ever absorb that much liquid. But I guess that’s the thing about a brandy pudding: it really is FULL of brandy.

It was damn delicious, and after my second helping, you will be unsurprised to know that I slept like a log.

Getting your Vitamin C

So someone gives you a bag of oranges and they aren’t your favourite fruit, what do you do? Make marmelade, naturally. I’ve made jam once before – strawberry, I believe – and remember the wonder of watching it turn from fruity porridge into jam right before my eyes; another one of those kitchen wonders, like beating eggs and sugar till they turn almost white and marshmallowy, or more obviously, watching bread and cakes rise (and for those lucky enough to have experienced, souffles and muffins).

My orange marmelade was less spectacular in showmanship than the strawberry jam, which I put down to my decision to use less sugar than the recipe stipulated (the oranges were already super-sweet, which also motivated my decision to add lots of fresh ginger in the mix), and not adding pectin to the pot. So I missed the big jelly moment, but when it cooled down, it was indeed marmelade, albeit a little more runny than conventional types. The mix of ginger and orange spoke well for itself on a slice of toast with cheese the following morning, even if half of it did end up on the philosophe’s trousers (his fault for not holding the toast at a perfectly horizontal angle!).

The question, then, of what next. I had my sights on some sticky marmelade (pork) ribs, but when I got to the shop all they had were beef ribs (who eats beef ribs?). Nevertheless, I seized them, and the day, and set to work trying to find out what to do with them. Rib recipes generally advocate the barbecue method, which I am told describes not just a cooking method, but can refer to a particular dish (complete with side stuff), or a whole occasion (not unlike our braai, I want to believe, but apparently I’m wrong. I plan to investigate this phenomenon more seriously in a week or two when the philosophe and I hit New Orleans, and have been duly directed to the famous Mother’s Restaurant). Given the Cape’s slow descent into winter (no good for outside fires no more), and my lack of slow-cooker or smoker, I had to go with an oven method, and found a recipe for braised beef short ribs.

I more or less followed that recipe, which sadly involved no marmelade, but I did substitute the veal stock for freshly squeezed orange juice, with the result – as Glen the sailor pointed out – of a very Daube tasting sauce (think slow cooked meat in red wine and orange juice). I’m not sure I can describe in any way that do them justice how those short beef ribs turned out. They were tender. Not fatty at all. Tender. Sweet Baby Jesus were they tender! They will be back on the table, oh yes they will.

(Isn’t it amazing that you can forget something you never even knew?)

Less amazing, but adequately good was the chicken I baked along with them, because it had this delicious sauce of … marmelade (and garlic and chilli). It had to get in there somehow, and so it did. And just like that, I made sure six of us (including one bun in the oven) got a righteous dose of Vitamin C: set for winter, at the hands of your good doctor.

I will call it a milestone

Late in 1996, which we shall refer to as more than a DECADE ago, I went to University (kind of) against my will. The brackets are only because I didn’t know what I wanted then, and I happened to be involved with somone whom the whole university escapade would take me away from, which was not a bad thing, but I was less clever then.

I went to university thinking I was going to do one thing, but I ended up doing another, and, after ten years or so, marrying a man I never thought I would but who turns out to be the person I want to spend my life with.

Today I got a letter from the unversity telling me I have become a Doctor of Philosophy (that’s Ph.D.), and since I have been there, that’s exactly what I wanted but I’m not sure I comprehend what it means to be there. Maybe that’s a sign that it’s not such a big deal at all, but for today, and for as long as it lasts, I will revel in the delightful uncertainty of celebrating something I’m not quite sure what means, but feels damn good (not unlike being married, come to think of it).

I thought I should drink champagne, and even lined it up, but then changed my mind (I was more keen for a nice glass of wine). Then I worried that I wasn’t making enough of a deal about it, but then I decided that if I didn’t drink champagne tonight, I would just have an even better excuse to do so tomorrow (or the day after that? etc.) The word “then”, incidentally, is wonderful. How to describe continuity and fickleness without it?

Anyway. I had a dinner invitation that involved me meeting my husband at another friend’s house, and when I got there, I found almost a bucket of roses on the table waiting for me, from my mother, who astoundingly is not even in the same country as me. Modern technology is truly amazing.

We had a very lovely casserole of beans and Turkish (or some such) sausage, washed down with decent wine and the aroma of fresh roses. It was a fine way to begin to celebrate what is, I believe, a milestone, even if I don’t know what shape it is.

At the dinner table I forgot to talk about the marmalade I recently made because someone gave us a bag of oranges, and more importantly, about what I plan to do with all that marmalade that I don’t eat on a regular basis anyway. At first I was bound by cakes and muffins – sweet stuff – until my friend Google reminded me of all the great savouries that involve smeet, sticky, citrus goodness: slow-roasted pork ribs, for instance, or baked chicken (wings?). Can I deep-fry prawns in a sweet, sticky, spicy batter? How about a hot prawn doughnut? It sounds like a doctor’s recommendation to me. More on that shortly…

Don’t smoke and drive

A lesson from The Washington Post:

The first clue that something might have been wrong was when a car pulled into a parking lot in with a “No Parking” sign and post stuck to the front end.

The proof isn’t always in the pudding

I have long heard about the famous Joy of Cooking cookbook – it is the only book Glen the sailor takes with him on all his travels – but it wasn’t until recently that I could say I have one in my very own kitchen. It was inherited, as the best books are, and therefore complete with all the markings of having been in use for many years (not to mention little folded scraps between the pages: a recipe cut out from somewhere else; a de-tox diet plan).

Anyway, I was preparing dinner for a bunch of people a couple of days ago, and I hadn’t quite settled on dessert, since the novelty of deep-fried ice-cream is wearing a little thin. I wasn’t stressed; there was ice-cream, and adding a shot of espresso can always produce a quick affogato for those who want something sweet at all. But while waiting for something else to do its thing in the oven (aubergine, I believe), I finally found a moment to sit down with a cup of coffee and browse through the book, and pretty soon I began to understand why people love it as much as they do. Presumably the main reason is that the recipes work, but the first thing that struck me was the sheer mass of recipes (including great ideas for variations on a theme), and a language which is unaffected and helpful at the same time. In other words, it’s the kind of book that makes you want to cook (and not a colour photograph in sight!).

A recipe for Maple Curls (maple flavoured brandy snaps) soon caught my attention as something that didn’t require too much commitment in terms of time or ingredients (always important for trying something new in case it doesn’t work out). This was a good call, because they didn’t quite work out – the flavour was good, but they didn’t spread as much as they should while baking, which pretty much cancelled out the curling option (which is what I was looking forward to). So I powered on with classic brandy snaps, which looked much closer to the real thing when they came out the oven (and they smelled perfect). These I could curl, or twirl, but that turned out to be less easy than the diagram promised: for one, mine were incredibly buttery, so greasy fingers made the whole operation quite messy, and they didn’t fully cooperate in terms of retaining the shapes that I curled them into. Nevertheless:

So they got a bit wonky, but there was a hole that you could actually see through:

And how well did they fare? Well, when the affogato finally hit the table, half the guests had left, and the remaining few weren’t that interested, so I was more or less solo on the tasting panel. OK, they were not quite brandy snaps because there was no snapping action (they didn’t crisp enough as they cooled: perhaps too buttery?), but the flavour was very good I thought, ditto the maple numbers.

In the end, the first part of the meal was probably the best: camembert and anchovies, both crumbed and deep-fried. (Do yourself a favour and seek out some crispy anchovies: they rock like nothing else, except maybe tempura ginger). But my first Joy of Cooking adventure was by far a failure, because it was only the first of many to come. I may even entrust Irma Rombauer with the deadly task of teaching me how to bake a muffin.

Popping chillies

It was only a matter of time before I had to try my hand at chilli (aka jalapeno) poppers. I remember the very first one I tried, now many years ago, at the Fat Cactus in Mowbray. Given that South Africa had lived in relative shelter from “real” Mexican food for many years (I’m quite sure the Aromat-sprinkled nachos at the die-hard Panchos in Observatory don’t count), biting into my first chilli popper was memorable. Imagine sinking your teeth into a perfectly crispy batter, and then through to a hot, spicy, melting inside (not to mention  washing it down  with a really fine classic margarita). It was like hearing a really good metaphor for the first time.

Alas, in the way of the best metaphors, the chilli popper soon made it onto many more menus than it deserved, and finding one that is worth eating has become something of a mission. Unless you make them yourself, that is.

For the first experiment, I of course had to try three different variations: crumbed and deep-fried; crumbed and baked; battered and deep-fried. I started by blanching and then stuffing the chillies with a home-made cheese (same recipe as for paneer: heat milk, add lemon juice, wait for curdle, drain to separate curds from whey, and stop when you have a cottage cheese consistency. Then add taste: chopped rocket, anchovies, lemon zest, garlic, salt and pepper). Then I froze them for a couple of hours so none of the coatings would get inside. The ones heading for batter stayed in the freezer until the last moment, but I coated the others in eggs and crumbs twice (once, then freeze for an hour or so before the next coating) before that point. It’s quite tricky getting the crumbs to stick to such a smooth surface, and I think next time I’ll follow Glen the sailor’s advice to lightly score the skins first. The batter was a tempura variation: a mixture of rice and cake flour, seasoning, and beer (no egg or soda water).

They were all successful in the sense that none of them failed or fell apart. The crumbed ones fried really well, and the resulting crust was complete (first order of success: make sure the coating creates an impenetrable casing that basically steams the chilli inside), golden brown and crunchy. Baking the same one (about 35 mins at 180) aso gives a good crispy casing, but in the heart-healthy way that baking operates, it was much more bready/cakey, and didn’t come as close to the ideal popper. (Having said that, the baking method is certainly a good idea if you don’t want to stand by a pot of hot oil and would rather be mingling: they are still good).

The beer batter didn’t expand as much as I had hoped; it didn’t expand at all, in fact, meaning that the surprise element of the popper was lost (the chilli was very thinly veiled). So that needs work/another recipe. But it was crispy.

What I really need to do is find the perfect chilli. The ones I crumbed were, according to Pick’n Pay, pimentos, and “perfect for stuffing”. But they had very little chilli bite. The battered ones were, according to Woolworths, jalapenos, with a “heat factor” of 6-7 (10 is hottest). Amazingly, the philosophe – who routinely boasts that he can eat food hotter than mere mortals can handle – found them too hot.

So, they worked, in the way that dead metaphors work. But the quest continues for the perfectly articulated chilli popper, and I am glad to say that yesterday’s various successes mean that I have removed all pressure from the glut of “Mexican” eateries in the city to fulfill that ideal. Now the pressure is on in my own kitchen, as it should be.

On another note, following the (inevitable) re-listing of El Bulli as the “world’s best restaurant”, it is heartening to see that some people remain sceptical of what a list like that means. Read the perpsective of one of the judges in the Independent.

And now I must go gamble. Adieu.

More brilliance

from the New Yorker:

Ssssssh – this is secret!

I believe I hit on something righteous last night while whipping up dinner for a band of gamblers at our kitchen table (in truth, it was training session for my benefit, as I’ll shortly be trying my luck at a casino in the fair Cape town of Worcester, but more on that later).

The main event was sesame-crusted seared tuna, but since I’ve become a friend of the hot oil, I couldn’t resist adding some crunch, and I hadn’t yet produced onion rings. The plan was to tempura them in a wok: also my first hot oil adventure without the deep-fryer and all its reassuring temperature control. So far, so good, and nothing particularly special about onion rings in a tempura batter, I hear you say. But what about slivers of fresh ginger in the same batter?

I have no idea why no one has thought of this before. (Hello!!!!!). If you google “ginger tempura” all you get is ginger as one ingredient in something else. But this little root deserves its very own parcel of crunchy goodness. They were like excellent little spicy nuggets, the slight burniness of fresh ginger perfectly tempered by the half a minute or so that they got to steam inside a rapidly crisping batter.

If the world has any sense, this number will find it’s way onto people’s plates in the very near future. Just remember where you heard it first, on this day of this year.

For those still looking for a tempura batter that works (and that means it goes real crunchy and stays that way even when it cools down), try this:

- 100g rice flour

- 1 egg white

- about half a cup of cold soda water (this depends on how thick you want the batter: some vegetables do well with a very thin coating, and you don’t mind if they aren’t completely immersed, while something like ginger wants quite a thick chunky batter to be completely sealed).

Go ahead and throw a teaspoon or so of Chinese five(/six/seven) spice into it to get some flavour going.

And here’s another tip I learnt (through error): if you tempura in a deep-fryer, don’t lay the vegetables into the basket and then lower that into the oil: the batter will grow into/around the bottom of the basket, and you’ll end up with stuck tempura. Make sure you lower whatever you’re frying directly into the oil, so the batter has space to grow; it should come floating up pretty much straight away.

Try the ginger. You will not be disappointed. (And how about whole garlic cloves? Or pre-roasted whole garlic cloves? Or that great Chinese ginger candy? Molecular gastronomists of the world, watch your backs! One of these days someone is going to deep fry soup in my kitchen).

I don’t know

It’s Sunday evening, the philosophe and friend (let’s call him Cash) are watching soccer, and I’ve been trying to figure out what to make of a recent remark by Glen the sailor, who is also our chef tonight (there is a persimmon soup and a brandade lasagne – topped with pine nuts and emmenthaler cheese – on the menu, and I bet no one else is having that tonight!).

Glen the sailor travels a lot (a LOT: he is the source of my Chinese lemons), and because of that, his life is generally free of that one thing that many of us cannot imagine living without: the moving picture (that includes television and cinema). Alas, he’s been with us for two weeks now, and we’ve already managed to change all that. Here comes a confession: I’ve gotten Glen hooked on Nip/Tuck and West Wing. (He would never admit to the addiction, and certainly not to the Nip/Tuck association, but I have seen it in action, and besides, this is a secure space where secrets are safe).

After one of the first bouts of box-watching, I found Glen standing in the kitchen with a puzzled look on his face. He explained that the thing about mindless TV series is that they “stick” – much to his displeasure, he found himself continuing to think about what he had seen long after the fact. This was more evil, he claimed, than Food TV, which he can immerse himself in and then forget about as soon as he walks away. For that reason he much prefers Food TV.

I think I am the exact opposite: I watch the schlock (an unecessarily unkind way to describe both West Wing and Nip/Tuck, I know), and am there for the duration, but typically the next day I can’t remember half the details that made up the narrative and kept me watching. On the other hand, if I watch Food TV that has any merit (and lets not pretend that there isn’t a lot of schlock there too), what I have seen will typically make it’s way onto a shopping list, and from there to an experiment in the kitchen, if not a chapter in the thesis.

If I had to choose, I would also say I prefer watching Food TV, for the simple reason that there is greater potential of it not being wasted time. The reason I love West Wng and Nip/Tuck is because they perform the function of wasting my time perfectly, with no strings attached.

Postscript: Monday morning:

I still don’t know what to make of Glen’s conundrum, and I can only hope that I haven’t caused irrevocable damage; last night after dinner we saw him engage in his first round of solo watching – no more excuses that he was watching because it “was there”, this time he pushed the play button himself. Let’s hope the dramas of the West Wing won’t invade his Monday too forcefully.

In the meantime, I’m glad to report that his cooking skills haven’t been compromised in the slightest. The brandade lasagne was exquisite – delicately fishy and rich, but nowhere near cloying (as some lasagne can be). The persimmon “soup” became dessert because of some very strange property of this fruit: once he pureed it, it became more or less solid, as if full of gelatine (?). With the addition of a little booze, then, it became a brandy-persimmon-mint jelly, which was rather wierd in the mouth, but in fact quite delicious and refreshing in the way of a palate-cleansing sorbet. We will let him cook again.

Page number: « First...51015...19 2021...253035...Last »