Gourmet Spectacle

spectacle.jpg

So, it ain’t enough to keep us glued to the screens with lowly popcorn anymore. No siree. The latest trend in not-so-gourmet America is the cinema eatery, where you can have a whole meal (guess which kind) while Bruce Willis shoots a helicopter with a car.

The most telling comment comes from Ross Melnick, a ‘movie theater historian’: “The food business is a potentially profitable one, but the film business is stuck with a lot of movies that don’t play very well after the first weekend. They’re counting on the people who buy food to boost their bottom lines.”

I dare say bottom-boosting is right on the mark.

movies_smg_160×160.jpg

There is, I believe, only one question worth asking (and it’s rhetorical):chesterfield.jpg

A ‘Philosophical Reflection’ for the Day

from Brillat-Savarin:

‘Fish, taken collectively in all their species, offer the philosopher an endless source of meditation and surprise.

The various forms of these strange creatures, the sense which they lack, the limited powers of those which they possess, the influence on their habits of the element in which they live and breathe and move, all combine to extend the range of our ideas, and our understanding of the infinite modifications which may arise from matter, movement, and life.

For my part, I like to look upon them with a feeling akin to respect, born of the conviction that they are antediluvian creatures; for the vast cataclysm which drowned our great uncles eight hundred years after the creation of the world was a time of joy, conquest, and festivity for the fishes.’

Well, I don’t know if it’s the fishies that are a little sinister, or the great philosopher, but I think that calls for calamari.

Hallmark does it again

Capitalising on loss, with Father’s Day cards for mothers (because there is no daddy). Read all about it here.

The great muffin parade

If you get up at four in the morning and spend your first cup of coffee reading about recipes (because that’s work) and you know you have a couple of stale muffins sitting around heading for nowhere but the bin, this is what you should do:

Slice them up, butter one side and lay the slices, butter side down, in an oven-proof dish. Now, if they’re fairly bland, you can add whatever you need to bling them up, like grated lemon zest, a good sprinkling of cinnamon, a little nutmeg, or cardamom, perhaps a little vanilla. Follow this with a meagre layer of apple chunks.

Then beat a couple of eggs, add some warm milk and pour this over the muffins and apples. A nice touch is then to throw a little handful of raisins into the mess, and a sprinkling of nuts and sugar.

Now bake the thing (moderately, around 180) for about 45 minutes, or until it’s looking nice and golden and there are some unmistakably warm, cinammony smells in the kitchen.

If you’re waiting for someone to wake up so you can have a second cup of coffee with company, these smells may prove enough to rouse them.

Or not.

Whichever the case, it is a good thing to do. And it’s a delicious breakfast, particularly on a cold and dark winter morning.

(I believe, by the way, that any form of stale, wheaty starch will work well, like day-old croissants, or, well, bread…which of course would make it a bread-and-butter pudding. Which mine wasn’t.)

I have a dongle!

Yes, I am slow to technology. I have now, for several years, dismissed cell phones with in-built cameras (that’s what cameras are for!) and steered clear of conversations that involve Bluetooth (because, who knows what it is, and who needs it).

But then I acquired the phone with the camera. Yet, between selling off my trusty old digital camera – how exciting it was just 6 years ago when I had a camera that could take 60 minutes of MOVING images! – and today, I have been unable to have any real fun with the pictures I’ve taken, because for some reason the cable connections between phone and computer failed, and I had no dongle (if you need to ask you don’t need to know).

So, now for evidence of the chocolate souffle I boasted about not so long ago:

And just the other day, there was a cherry pie. It wasn’t as sweet as Sade, and to be honest, the base was too thick and therefore a little stodgy. But who cares, what the dongle don’t see don’t matter.

Killer nightcap

1 part wodka

1/2 part cordial of some sort (if you have Swedish organic elderflower cordial, so much the better)

1 part lemony fizzy water

1 part Bob’s your Uncle

and while you’re there, lorem ipsum

This is not a cupcake

ny_cupcakes_crumbs_02.jpg

It is the equivalent, rather, of three slices of pizza. So says the Diet Detective in a recent piece on how fattening New York’s cupcakes are. The Detective’s findings are sure to sprout plenty of guilty conscience, or, perhaps a whole lot of jogging, as he helpfully points out that a six-mile jog should work off one of these babies.

Now that’s all fine and dandy, and thank goodness for the earnest efforts of people who tirelessly calculate calories and how best to avoid them. But – and excuse me for pointing out the obvious – if you go into a “bake shop” like Crumbs, whence this cupmonster hails, and where the ‘emphasis is on size‘ (including fillings like Snickers slices, Oreo pieces, and M&Ms), not to mention 1.5cm of icing, how exactly could it not be Bloody Obvious that the thing has significantly more calories than an apple?

“Do What You Do Best”. Whatever.

So, in the new twisted world of food and business, it should come as no surprise that Gordon Ramsay, fondly referred to as that tediously sweary gastronome, is the new face of BT (British Telecommunications).

Funny, how after the man has proved himself as wily a businessman as chef (it is, after all, quite a feat to be cooking in over ten restaurants in two continents, starring in a TV show, and all the etcetera, all at once), the ad pumps him up as someone who can’t even manage a DIY broadband installation. And he goes for it. (Let’s not ask what he gets out of it.)

Watch it here. Nota bene: there are no F-words, which is another first.

A fountain of knowledge

Question 1: Why is it grammatically incorrect if a waiter tells you to “Enjoy!”

Answer 1: It’s a useless thing to say because if the food is good you’ll enjoy it whether the waiter tells you to or not.

Answer 2: Because it might cause you to wonder whether your food or drink has been poisoned.

Answer 3: Because food is not enjoyable.

Question 2: Why is “raining cats and dogs” a dead metaphor?

(The only) answer: In the olden days, cats used to fall off roofs when it rained but they don’t do that anymore and people don’t realise that.

Challenge: If anyone can correctly guess the age and educational level of the people who provided these answers, I will personally come to your kitchen and cook you a souffle.

Imagine a life

of work, food, sleep, and no time to blog. This is it.

I can manage a cursory list, however, of good things ingested recently:

Out: last night, braised guinea fowl (on a blahblah risotto, with blahblah sauce) at Rozenhof on Kloof; it was tender and delicious, but too much, particularly after the not-so-light souffle that was my starter.

In: chicken breasts stuffed with smoked sundried tomatoes and sage, wrapped in parma ham, and served with petit pois a la moutarde (blahblah), and home-baked sourdough bastoni with olives. The poule was followed by chocolate souffle (and it rose!). That was me at the stove; one for the books.

In: pasta (penne?) with fresh porcini and – aaaaaah – Jordan Whole Nine Yards Chardonnay. A wine that appeals to my decadent side.

In, severally: biscotti with cardamom and pecan nuts (a winning combination).

Out: a fine little steak at Hatfields, a fine little restaurant close to the Jewish Museum.

Tonight: in/out, who knows. But recent trends bode well for it being fine, whatever it is.

Page number: « First...51015...25 2627...3035...Last »